-
CNET editors' rating:
3.0 stars
Good
Detailed editors' rating -
Average user rating:
Write your own review - See all user reviews
Product summary
The good: Clean, classy design; largest display at this price; hard display control buttons; lots of upgrading potential.
The bad: Significantly slower than even Apple's older iMac; no Blu-ray drive; no 802.11n wireless.
The bottom line: Like other Windows-based all-in-ones, Averatec's All-in-One can't compete with the iMac for sheer power. The Averatec's larger screen and few features it has that Apple doesn't might be enough to sell you, but the iMac remains the all-in-one to beat.
Specifications: Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo E4600 (2.4 GHz); RAM installed: 2 GB DDR2 SDRAM; Hard drive: 320 GB Standard; See full specs
Price range: $799.99 - $1,064.99
CNET editors' review
- Reviewed on: 06/20/2008
Averatec's new, self-describing All-in-One offers yet another Windows-based take on the iMac. Compared with similar systems from Dell and Gateway, the $1,300 All-in-One actually has the most aggressive price, as well as the largest screen. In general, and as with those others, Averatec's new PC is less compelling than the iMac. As is typical of Windows-based all-in-ones, the Averatec offers the capability to upgrade that the iMac cannot. And either the larger screen or Windows Vista may be selling points or necessities for some of you, as well. Otherwise, there's very little this Averatec can do that the iMac doesn't do better.
If it can't overcome Apple's iMac juggernaut, the Averatec All-in-One does at least stake a claim as the best designed of the Windows all-in-ones. The glossy black frame features clean lines with no severe angles, protruding speakers, or wasted space. In addition to familiar design elements like a side-mounted slot-loading optical drive and a row of ports on the back, the Averatec also features hard buttons on the right edge that offer basic display controls, for brightness, display power (separate from system power, a nice touch), as well as volume and mute buttons. We admit we find those peripheral buttons useful, and the iMac doesn't have them, but they're probably not enough of a benefit to make up for the All-in-One's less-than-compelling performance.
| Averatec All-in-One | Apple iMac | |
| Price | $1,299 | $1,299 |
| Screen size | 22-inches | 20-inches |
| CPU | 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo E4600 | 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo |
| Memory | 2GB 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM | 2GB 800MHz DDR2 SDRAM |
| Graphics | 256MB (shared) Nvidia GeForce 8400M GS | 128MB ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT |
| Hard drives | 320GB, 7,200rpm | 250GB, 7,200rpm |
| Optical drive | dual-layer DVD burner | dual-layer DVD burner |
| Networking | Gigabit Ethernet, 802.11a/b/g wireless | Gigabit Ethernet, 802.11a/b/g wireless; Bluetooth |
| Operating system | Windows Vista Home Premium SP1 | Apple Mac OS X |
| TV Tuner | Yes | No |
We've only tested the pricier, 24-inch iMac since Apple updated the lineup a few months ago. It would hardly be fair to compare that model with the Averatec, so instead we looked back in our testing database and found the results for the 20-inch iMac from the previous generation. That old iMac that we reviewed cost $1,650 last September, counting the upgrade to 2GB of RAM. The newer 20-inch iMac, on sale now with a faster CPU and faster RAM, starts at $1,200, and would cost $1,300 for 2GB of RAM (as configured in the chart above). If we assume that a new $1,300 iMac would outperform the old $1,650 iMac, as seems reasonable, and since the old iMac is faster than the Averatec's performance today, it's a safe bet that the newer, less expensive iMac would expand the performance gap even further.
And unfortunately for Averatec, that is indeed the case.
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
 |
Rendering Multiple CPUs | |
Rendering Single CPU |
On every single test, the old 20-inch iMac is faster than the Averatec. On some tests, for example dual-core video processing on Cinebench, the two are close. However, on others, such as Photoshop, the iMac outpaces the Averatec system, as well as the other Windows-based PCs, by a large margin.
What's perhaps worse, the $650 Gateway GT5674 is also faster than the $1,300 Averatec on all but our iTunes MP3 encoding test. In other words, you could buy that Gateway and an exceptional 24-inch LCD for the same price as the Averatec. That illustrates the biggest shortcoming of Windows-based all-in-ones, and it's not exclusive to this Averatec model. The performance gap between an Apple iMac and a standard desktop is much smaller than it is between a standard PC and a Windows-based all-in-one. Likely, this has to do with Vista and its more demanding performance overhead compared with Apple's OS X. However, for accomplishing actual computing tasks, the iMac is a far better deal.
Continue reading- See more CNET content tagged:
- Averatec,
- Apple iMac,
- All-in-One,
- Intel Core 2 Duo,
- Apple Computer
User reviews
-
Average user rating:
0 stars
Not yet available
Back to product review - My rating: 0 stars Write review
-
Showing 2 of 2 user reviewsSee all 2 user reviews
- See all 2 user reviews Write review
Averatec All-in-One:
