Nokia 5310 Xpress Music - orange series

Nokia 5310 Xpress Music - orange (T-Mobile) Reviewed on 05/30/2008

The Bottom Line: The Nokia 5310 continues the fine Xpress Music tradition by offering a satisfying blend of features and performance in an attractive design.

Specs: GSM 850/1800/1900 (Tri-Band), With digital camera / digital player / FM radio, 2.5 oz

CNET editors' take

Nokia 5310 Xpress Music - blue (unlocked) Reviewed on 05/30/2008

The Bottom Line: The Nokia 5310 continues the fine Xpress Music tradition by offering a satisfying blend of features and performance in an attractive design.

Specs: Up to 300 min, With digital camera / digital player / FM radio, 2.5 oz

CNET editors' take

Nokia 5310 Xpress Music - red (unlocked) Reviewed on 05/30/2008

The Bottom Line: The Nokia 5310 continues the fine Xpress Music tradition by offering a satisfying blend of features and performance in an attractive design.

Specs: Up to 300 min, With digital camera / digital player / FM radio, 2.5 oz

CNET editors' take

Nokia 5310 Xpress Music - red (T-Mobile) Reviewed on 05/30/2008

The Bottom Line: The Nokia 5310 continues the fine Xpress Music tradition by offering a satisfying blend of features and performance in an attractive design.

Specs: GSM 850/1800/1900 (Tri-Band), With digital camera / digital player / FM radio, 2.5 oz

CNET editors' take

Nokia 5310 Xpress Music - purple (T-Mobile) Reviewed on 05/30/2008

The Bottom Line: The Nokia 5310 continues the fine Xpress Music tradition by offering a satisfying blend of features and performance in an attractive design.

Specs: GSM 850/1800/1900 (Tri-Band), With digital camera / digital player / FM radio, 2.5 oz

CNET editors' take

Nokia 5310 Xpress Music - silver (T-Mobile) Reviewed on 05/30/2008

The Bottom Line: The Nokia 5310 continues the fine Xpress Music tradition by offering a satisfying blend of features and performance in an attractive design.

Specs: GSM 850/900/1900 (Tri-Band), Up to 300 min, With digital camera / digital player / FM radio, 2.5 oz

CNET editors' take